During a gold rush, the reliable fortunes were made by the people selling picks and shovels, not the ones panning the river. The AI boom has its own version of that trade, and it runs through the physical layer of the electrical system: transformers, switchgear, circuit breakers, and transmission lines. Jon Najarian’s Infinite Power presentation for Banyan Hill leans hard on this hardware story, and it is the most grounded part of an otherwise promotional pitch. We walk through the specifics in our The Najarian Brothers: Dr. J and Pete’s Story piece. For the full backstory, see our Peter Najarian: The Other Half of Dr. J’s Firm article.
The Picks-and-Shovels Idea
The logic is simple enough to state in one line. Whether a data center plugs into the public grid or generates its own power on site, it cannot run without the physical equipment that moves and transforms electricity. That equipment is the picks-and-shovels of the AI build-out, and it wears out.
Najarian’s framing is blunt: “The biggest winners in any boom aren’t the companies on the front pages. They’re the suppliers.” In the AI boom, the front pages belong to chip designers and hyperscalers. The suppliers are the companies manufacturing the hardware that carries the current.
The Hardware That Is Wearing Out
The most sobering part of the presentation is not a growth forecast; it is an inventory of aging infrastructure. The 2025 American Society of Civil Engineers report card grades US energy infrastructure a D+, and the age statistics are worse than the grade suggests: 70% of power transformers are 25 years or older, 60% of circuit breakers are 30 years or older, and 70% of transmission lines are 25 years or older.
Transformers are the load-bearing piece here. They step voltage up and down between the grid and the customer, and there is no modern economy without them. They are also slow and expensive to manufacture, which makes an aging fleet a genuine supply problem, not just a maintenance note. Our full Infinite Power teardown covers how Najarian quotes these figures.
The $5 Trillion Question
The University of Texas Energy Institute estimates that fully modernizing the US grid would cost near $5 trillion. The Department of Energy has added urgency with a warning that blackouts could rise 100 times by 2030 under certain scenarios. That is the size of the opportunity Najarian is pointing at, and it is a real number from a credible source.
But here is the distinction the pitch tends to blur. The $5 trillion repair bill is mostly utilities’ spending on wires, transformers, and generation. The specific company Najarian is selling serves a narrower slice: on-site gas-turbine installations for data centers. Both sit in the same theme, but they are different businesses with different buyers. For another angle on the AI power bottleneck, our Elon’s Shadow Trust review covers an income portfolio built around it.
Where the Pitch Fits
The precedent runs Najarian cites are the cleanest way to see the hardware trade in action. Vertiv, the data center power and cooling supplier, returned roughly 1,200% from its 2020 SPAC debut. Generac, the generator maker, surged about 850% through the pandemic. Quanta Services, the grid construction contractor, has climbed roughly 8,600% since its 1998 IPO. Each is a hardware-layer company that re-rated when demand for electricity infrastructure spiked.
The teased pick is a Houston-headquartered, NYSE-listed company near a $6 billion market cap that leases gas-turbine power pods, and it sits behind the $79 paywall. It is not one of the named precedent stocks.
The Memphis Workaround
The hardware story also has a fast-moving wing. At Memphis, xAI needed 150 megawatts, the local utility could spare about 8, and Tennessee Valley Authority approval would have taken three years. So xAI trucked in roughly 35 gas-turbine power pods, each 91 feet long and about 200,000 pounds, and stood up more than 400 megawatts in about 122 days. That is grid hardware too, just mobile and leased rather than buried and permanent, and it is the specific slice of the theme the presentation is selling.
The Two Hardware Markets
The pitch quietly spans two different hardware markets, and keeping them apart matters. There is the utility grid market, the transformers, switchgear, and transmission lines behind the $5 trillion repair estimate, which utilities will buy on their own slow schedule. Then there is the data center market, the on-site gas turbines and pods that hyperscalers are buying today because they cannot wait. The teased pick lives in the second market, which is smaller today but growing far faster, and that distinction explains most of the pitch’s appeal.
The Honest Read
The grid hardware thesis is the credible core of this pitch: the equipment is real, it is aging, and the replacement bill is enormous. What requires care is the leap from “the hardware theme is huge” to “this specific supplier will capture it.” Those are two different claims, and the presentation spends most of its energy proving the first while the second stays behind a paywall, with the familiar single-customer concentration as the fine-print risk.
Ready to see the research? Click here to access Jon Najarian’s report.
NewsletterVetter is an independent publication. We receive compensation from some of the services we review through affiliate links. Nothing on this site is investment advice. Always do your own research.