The single most interesting idea in Jon Najarian’s Infinite Power presentation is not the AI story, which you have heard before, but a three-word phrase: power as a service. It is the pivot the entire pitch hangs on, and it changes how you are supposed to value the company being teased. Here is what the model means and whether the valuation argument holds water. We walk through the specifics in our Behind-the-Meter Power for Data Centers, Explained piece. We break down that angle in our Elon’s Infinite Power Grid: Najarian’s Pitch Decoded piece.

What Power as a Service Means

Most industrial equipment is sold once. A company builds a turbine, a customer buys it, and the transaction is over. Power as a service is different: the supplier owns the equipment and leases it to the customer under long-term contracts, in this case 10-to-15-year terms, collecting revenue month after month instead of a single upfront payment.

Najarian’s framing from the presentation: “It’s called power as a service. And it changes everything about how to value this company.” The claim is not that the company makes turbines; it is that the company becomes the operator of a fleet of turbines it owns, selling the electricity, or the availability of electricity, as a subscription.

The Landlord Analogy

The cleanest way to understand the pitch is a landlord comparison. A company that sells a generator is like a home builder, booking revenue once when the house closes. A company that leases power pods is like a landlord, collecting rent every month on assets it still owns.

That distinction matters because investors price the two businesses very differently. A builder’s earnings are lumpy and depend on winning the next contract. A landlord’s earnings are recurring and predictable, and predictable recurring revenue tends to earn a higher valuation multiple. Najarian is betting the market will eventually re-rate this supplier from “equipment vendor” to “contracted infrastructure owner.” Our full Infinite Power teardown lays out that reframing in detail.

The Numbers Behind the Model

The teased company, a Houston-headquartered, NYSE-listed firm near a $6 billion market cap, gives the model a concrete shape. Revenue roughly doubled from just over $300 million in 2023 to over $600 million in 2024. There is about 2 gigawatts under contract across three hyperscaler customers: xAI as the anchor at roughly 900 megawatts, a second 500-megawatt contract beginning January 2027, and a third 600-megawatt contract scaling through 2028.

The fine print the pitch itself volunteers is the concentration: 96% of 2024 Power Pod revenue came from a single customer, xAI. That is the landlord analogy with a catch, a building with one tenant who could theoretically walk. Najarian’s counterargument is that the contracted pipeline, over a gigawatt coming online through 2028, diversifies the base even if xAI left tomorrow.

Why It Changes the Valuation Question

The real question the pitch is asking is not whether the company grows, but how the market will value it. A cyclical equipment vendor might deserve a lower multiple. A contracted power operator with a decade of locked-in lease revenue might deserve an infrastructure multiple, the kind utilities and toll-road operators command.

That is a legitimate argument, and it is the intellectual core of the offer. It also cuts the other way: the same long-term contracts that create recurring revenue also lock the company into fixed terms and expose it to customer concentration risk. For the income angle on the same power theme, see our Elon’s Shadow Trust review.

The Southaven Proof Point

The landlord model also needs scale to work, and the pitch provides it. The same pod design that powered Memphis is now deploying at Southaven, Mississippi, at roughly 100 pods and about 1.5 gigawatts, which is what turns a single lease into a fleet. Each added pod is another 10-to-15-year revenue stream. The contract schedule gives that recurring revenue a visible ramp rather than a hope: a 500-megawatt contract beginning January 2027 and a 600-megawatt contract scaling through 2028, on a 10-year term with a five-year extension option. That is the difference between a vendor with a backlog and a landlord with an annuity, and it is the entire point of the reframing.

The Honest Read

Power as a service is not a gimmick; it is a real business model with a real valuation implication, and the “quiet landlord of the AI boom” framing is one of the more thoughtful analogies we have seen in this genre. The open questions are the usual ones: whether the single anchor customer is a feature or a fragility, and whether the market will grant the infrastructure multiple Najarian is counting on. The identity of the pick remains behind the $79 paywall, and we do not name a ticker.

Ready to see the research? Click here to access Jon Najarian’s report.

NewsletterVetter is an independent publication. We receive compensation from some of the services we review through affiliate links. Nothing on this site is investment advice. Always do your own research.