Space Millionaires Review: Is Dylan Jovine’s Behind the Markets Worth It?

“We are weeks away from the biggest migration of money in market history. On December 8th, SpaceX insiders will finally be able to sell $600 billion worth of stock.” Dylan Jovine’s “Space Millionaires” presentation is built on a real date with real mechanics, the Day-180 lockup expiry after the June 2026 SpaceX IPO, and it argues the freed money will flow into a single $14 company: the firm building “The Moon’s Phone Company.” What elevates this one is its sourcing discipline, a genuinely free ETF pick, and two named sells that cut against the promotional grain. Here is our complete review, including the supply-side reading the presentation does not engage.

Images to be added when available.

The Presenter

Dylan Jovine’s origin story is the through-line of all his pitches, and it checks out: “I grew up on food stamps in Queens. No trust fund, no connections, no Ivy League diploma. In 1991, a legendary banker named Peter Jacquith… took a chance on me when nobody else would.” The lesson he attributes to Jaquith, “studying a stock is like reading a short history book,” is the method behind this whole presentation: reading filings others skip.

The space track record is stated with an unusually explicit peak-gains disclosure: “I recommended Palantir at $7.38, when the smart money had left it for dead. It went as high as $207, a 2,712% gain, after our entry… I recommended IonQ when quantum computing was a punchline on trading desks. It handed readers a 944% gain after our entry… I recommended Rocket Lab at $3.80… It went on to a 3,800% gain after our entry.” Immediately after: “Those are peak gains, measured from my recommendation dates. Not every reader caught every point, and profits were banked along the way. Nobody sells the exact top… including me.” Then the aggregate stat: “Across every closed recommendation in my flagship research service… winners and losers together… 71% have made money, with average gains north of 50%… My losers sit on the same page as my winners.”

That is the most candid track-record disclosure we have seen in this genre, and the most striking credibility beat is the SEC story, told with the uncomfortable parts left in: “my trades got so consistently profitable that I was accused of insider trading. I sat down with the SEC… no lawyer, just my brokerage records and an explanation of how I invest. After a couple of hours we shook hands, and I never heard from them again.”

The macro calls are documented: the 2006 housing warning, the March 2009 bottom call on Fox Business eleven days before the low, the March 2020 COVID bottom call. Authority transfer runs through Elon Musk (“It will be much bigger”), Ron Baron (“SpaceX could eventually be worth $20 trillion or more”), NASA associate administrator Ken Bowersox and communications director Kevin Coggins, plus the World Economic Forum’s $1.8 trillion-by-2035 forecast.

The Big Idea

The unique mechanism is a lunar communications network, and the problem statement is genuinely educational: “Everything in space has to do one thing before it can earn a dime. It has to call home. A satellite that can’t send its data down is a very expensive piece of junk. And here’s what almost nobody outside NASA seems to understand. The Moon is a dead zone.” The geometry case is real physics: the far side never sees Earth, and at the lunar south pole, the exact region NASA plans to land astronauts, “Earth barely clears the horizon,” with Artemis blackouts running “about 41 minutes… with human beings on the other side.”

The solution is a five-satellite constellation doing three jobs: Moon-Earth relay, surface-to-surface relay (“a rover in a crater can talk to a lander over the ridge”), and “Broadcast position and timing. Think GPS. For the Moon.” The regulatory story is the moat: NASA “ran a formal competition… for the job of building and operating communications and navigation around another world… And handed the job to a commercial company. The first time in the agency’s history. Not a research grant. Not a study. A services contract.” The FCC application, “Docketed at the Federal Communications Commission on July 1st, 2026,” asks to bend “the Table of Frequency Allocations… the government’s master map of the airwaves,” and the historical analogy does the rest: “The last time Washington had to invent rules for a network… it was radio, a century ago. The company born at the center of that was RCA.” RCA’s stock “rose nearly 20,000% before the decade was out.”

The lockup mechanics are explained honestly: the staged releases since late summer end at “Day 180,” December 8, 2026, freeing “more than $600 billion” of insider stock. The presentation’s thesis is that the freed money “knows exactly where it’s going”: “I believe the lion’s share of it will flood into one small company.”

The Key Claims

The headline claims, quoted:

  • “If the second wave mints millionaires at just HALF the first wave’s rate… That’s more than 17,000 brand-new millionaires.”
  • The target stock: “One I believe has the potential to surge 1,000% or more in the coming months… Based on a first-of-its-kind contract commissioned by NASA.”
  • The historical ladder: AST SpaceMobile “A 5,660% move in under two years,” American Tower “returned 10,154%,” Cisco “just over 100,600%,” with the chart caption “$10,000 → at least $500,000.”

The qualification discipline is unusually good: the 17,000 figure is explicitly conditional, the projections are labeled (“THE FOURTH RUNG PROJECTED”), and the mock future headlines carry their own label: “Disclaimer: For illustration only, hypothetical future headlines.” The belief language is consistent, “I believe the lion’s share of it will flood into one small company,” “My honest belief? It does better.”

The compliance notes, honestly stated: the hypothetical newspaper graphics are designed to be screenshot-able even with their labels; the “$10,000 → at least $500,000” caption converts a historical analogy into a floor-style claim no disclaimer fully supports; and the presentation never engages the classic counter-reading of a lockup expiry, which is that Day 180 is conventionally a supply event, insider selling pressure on the stock itself, not automatically a bullish signal for adjacent micro-caps. A fair review has to present both readings, and we do: the December 8 date is real and the mechanics are accurately explained, but “$600 billion floods into a micro-cap” is asserted, not demonstrated, and a lockup expiry is just as classically a moment of supply overhang for space stocks generally.

The Free Ticker

The promo gives away one genuinely free, fully named recommendation and two named sells:

  • UFO, the Procure Space ETF: “Ticker symbol: UFO. Yes. Really. Wall Street occasionally has a sense of humor.” It “holds 67 companies across the space economy,” with Garmin as the biggest holding, Rocket Lab inside, and “about 4.6% of the whole thing… is SpaceX itself,” up about 29% over the past year. The framing is generous to a fault: “This is a real recommendation, and it’s free. If you never spend a dime with me, buy the fund and you’ll own the boom.” He then explains why the ETF is not his preferred vehicle: “By design, it owns everything. Your dollar gets spread 67 ways.”
  • Virgin Galactic (SPCE) and Momentus (MNTS), free sells: “Virgin Galactic… has lost more than 90% of its value, and keeps pushing its first flights further out. Momentus traded near $34 a share within the past year. It’s close to $4 today… I’d be a seller of both.” Candid risk-side advice is rare in this genre, and it is the entry point to the Space Junk bonus report.

The secret “$14 company” is deliberately unnamed, with a fingerprint we leave to the Ticker Revealer: founded by former NASA scientists, every mission flown on SpaceX rockets, a NASA lunar relay services contract structured to run five years with options for five more, first satellite already being fitted with NASA hardware, and a dense institutional fingerprint, “510 institutional owners,” a “$3.42 billion” combined stake, positions up more than 70% in the latest quarter, the largest holder a Boston buyout giant that previously took Maxar private. The FCC docket dated July 1, 2026 is a checkable primary source, and the Revealer should start there.

What You Get

The product is a one-year subscription to Behind the Markets, described as “a research relationship”: the monthly issue, the complete model portfolio, buy and sell alerts, and special situation reports “at no extra charge.”

The “Wealth Kit” includes five reports: The Second Window: The Moon’s Phone Company (the main pitch: name, ticker, buy-up-to price), The Space Millionaire Portfolio, The Takeover File: 3 Small Space Companies I Believe the Giants Want Next, The Behind the Markets Playbook (“Written for the reader who’s never bought a stock in his life”), and the bonus Space Junk: 5 Space Stocks to Sell Now.

Price: “The retail price of a year of Behind the Markets is $199… today, on this page and nowhere else, the price is 75% off retail. A full year… For just $49,” reframed as “about 13 cents a day. Less than you tipped the last person who handed you a coffee.” Risk reversal: “You get 6 full months to decide… call my customer care team, or just send one email… and you get every dime back,” with “everything I’ve sent staying yours either way.” The scarcity, “only 1,000 copies of The Second Window available today,” is attached to a digital report, which is a manufactured cap worth naming. Real cost: $49 is the stated annual price with the $199 anchor implying possible renewal near retail; the page does not spell out auto-renewal terms.

Our Take

This is one of the best-documented space promos we have reviewed, and its strengths are structural: a real unlock date with accurately explained mechanics, a paper trail (NASA documents, a dated FCC docket, named officials), a free ETF pick with holdings data, two named sells, and a track-record disclosure that includes losers in the denominator. The lunar dead-zone physics and the three-job network description teach real science before they sell anything, and the RCA/American Tower/Cisco precedent ladder, while cherry-picked, is at least a real historical pattern.

The honest counterweights, in order of importance: the central flow thesis, that $600 billion of unlocked insider stock concentrates into one micro-cap, is the presentation’s largest unsubstantiated leap, and the conventional reading of a lockup expiry runs the other way. The 1,000-copy scarcity on a digital good is manufactured. The mock headlines and the “at least half a million” arithmetic do emotional work their labels only partially contain. And a $14 micro-cap with a five-satellite network is a binary-risk position: the moat argument is strong, but the company’s fortunes will move on contract milestones and FCC procedure, not on smooth adoption curves.

Who is this for? Readers who want a deeply sourced, event-driven space thesis and are comfortable sizing a micro-cap position accordingly, or who simply want the free UFO pick and the two sells. The $49 year with a six-month, keep-everything refund makes the trial close to costless. Take the December 8 date seriously as a fact, and take the “where the money flows” claim as the thesis it is.

Where to Learn More

NewsletterVetter is an independent publication. We receive compensation from some of the services we review through affiliate links. Nothing on this site is investment advice. Always do your own research.