Chaikin Power Gauge: The 20-Factor System Examined

The product behind every Chaikin Analytics pitch is the same: the Power Gauge, a 20-factor stock rating system that outputs a simple bullish, neutral, or bearish rating on thousands of stocks daily. The new 401(ai) presentation uses it to build a five-stock retirement portfolio. We examined the system, its pedigree, and the honest questions about it. Our full 401(ai) teardown covers the presentation.

The Pedigree

The Power Gauge’s credibility rests on a career, and the checkable parts of it are real. Marc Chaikin started on Wall Street in 1966, created computerized quantitative trading programs in 1979, and invented the Chaikin Money Flow indicator, which genuinely ships in Bloomberg and Reuters terminals worldwide. Nasdaq licensed the research for three stock indexes, launched in 2014. The pitch’s billionaire evidence, that Steve Cohen, Paul Tudor Jones, George Soros, and Michael Steinhardt “sought out his work,” fits the documented history of institutional interest in his analytics. The host’s framing is accurate: “They wanted another way of seeing what was changing.”

How It Works

The pitch’s summary: “The Power Gauge looks at 20 separate factors for thousands of stocks every day. Some are tied to the company’s financials. Others look at price activity, analyst behavior and money flow.” Chaikin’s own reframe is the pitch’s best line: “I think of them more like 20 witnesses.” One witness can be wrong; several improving together is a signal. The output is deliberately simple, bullish, neutral, or bearish, and the intended use is equally simple: get positioned while a transition is “developing, not after everybody can see where the money has already moved.”

The Evidence Offered

The historical signals the pitch cites with dates: Occidental (OXY) bullish on January 14, 2022, before “Berkshire had purchased more than 100 million shares”; Vertiv (VRT) bullish in April 2023, before a climb of more than 727% and institutional follow-on, “Ray Dalio established a new 60,000 share position. Ken Griffin of Citadel increased his position by 258%. Vanguard added 3.4 million shares worth over a billion dollars”; Lumentum (LITE) bullish in August 2025 before climbing as much as 753%; AppLovin (APP) at $13 in March 2023.

The honest caveats: these are winners shown after the fact, with peak “as much as” framing and no contemporaneous losing signals except one, Braze, which the presentation volunteers unprompted: “It was trading for about 32 then. Today it’s around 24… Of course, that’s investing. If I showed you five perfect stocks, you should stop watching. The Power Gauge is not a crystal ball. It never has been.”

The System’s Coverage

What the 20 factors actually cover, per the pitch’s summary, is four families of evidence: “Some are tied to the company’s financials. Others look at price activity, analyst behavior and money flow.” The last two are where Chaikin’s pedigree lives: Chaikin Money Flow, his best-known invention, measures accumulation and distribution, whether institutional money is entering or leaving a stock, and it ships in every Bloomberg and Reuters terminal on earth. Analyst behavior and price activity add the market’s own verdict to the fundamentals’ verdict, which is the point of the “witnesses” frame: no single factor carries a case, but several pointing the same way is a signal.

The pitch’s institutional confirmation examples show what the system is watching for. After the April 2023 bullish Vertiv rating: “Ray Dalio established a new 60,000 share position. Ken Griffin of Citadel increased his position by 258%. Vanguard added 3.4 million shares worth over a billion dollars.” The claim the system makes is that it flagged the stock before the big money arrived, not that it predicted the money. On the bearish side, the same factors in reverse, money moving the wrong way, deteriorating earnings, expectations outrunning businesses, are what populate the “Five Stocks to Sell Now” companion report.

The Questions Worth Asking

Does a rating before a move prove a system has forward edge? Not by itself: with thousands of stocks rated daily, some bullish ratings will precede big moves by chance. The pitch’s hypothetical-basket demonstration, 137% for five September 2025 bullish names, carries an unusually candid in-presentation disclaimer: “This is not an actual portfolio that was offered to subscribers… These results are not typical nor indicative of future performance.”

What is it not? Per Chaikin, honestly: “I don’t manage people’s money anymore… And I cannot give you individualized investment advice.” The system is a screening tool sold through research subscriptions, not a managed product.

What backs the numbers? The presentation points to a details and disclosures page for its backtest claims, which is above genre standard in transparency, though the page itself is outside the VSL.

The Honest Read

The Power Gauge is one of the most credentialed products in the newsletter genre: real inventor, real institutional history, real licensing, and a presenter who volunteers losses and disclaims his own demonstrations. The open question is the one that matters: whether a 20-factor composite reliably calls the arms of the AI economy early, and no presentation can prove that ahead of time. For the portfolio it just built, see our 401(ai) overview; for the service’s value question, our Power Gauge Report examination. The witnesses are real. Their verdict is what you are paying to hear.

NewsletterVetter is an independent publication. We receive compensation from some of the services we review through affiliate links. Nothing on this site is investment advice. Always do your own research.