Ripping Point Casualties: The Stocks on the List

Ripping Point Casualties is the sell-side report in Whitney Tilson’s N.E.W. System offer, and the two-list structure it belongs to is worth appreciating before the names matter: “Your two free research reports, Ripping Point Riches and Ripping Point Casualties” - seven top-scoring stocks to buy, and “The Ripping Point Casualties, The Seven Low-Scoring Stocks You May Already Own.” A pitch that sells the exits alongside the entries is claiming symmetry, and symmetry is checkable in a way moonshots are not. We read the presentation end to end. Our full AI Civil War teardown covers it in detail.

What the List Promises

The report’s framing is aimed at the portfolio you already hold: seven names scoring at the bottom of the system’s 0-to-100 scale, companies the AI sorting has marked as “hemorrhaging value headed toward irrelevance.” The pitch’s sell philosophy, stated once and worth quoting: “Selling the wrong stock at the right time can do more for your retirement than picking ten right ones.”

The demonstration names for the low-score side are given with outcomes: “Resolve AI, which only scored a 37… would have wiped out 77 percent of your money since the summer of 2024, or multi-sensor AI would have scored just 46 points… and has crashed 76 percent,” and Jet.ai at a score of 15, “wiped out entirely over the past 12 months.” The bigger, more familiar casualty catalog runs alongside: Gartner (roughly 60-70% down from highs), Duolingo (down about 75%), Oracle, Salesforce, and the consulting complex (Accenture, S&P Global, FactSet, Morningstar) - all real, documented drawdowns the presentation cites accurately.

The Free Demonstration

The report names are membership content, but the pitch pays out one sell for free, with unusual bluntness: “My number one stock to avoid right now is Rivian, ticker R-I-V-I-A-N… the financial reality is brutal. Rivian is burning through $2 billion in cash every single year. It’s already carrying $5 billion in debt. And to keep the lights on, it keeps issuing new shares, which means every share you hold is worth a little less than it was yesterday… If you own this one, I’d get out immediately.” The financial facts check out: the debt, burn, and dilution pattern is accurate, as is the slowing EV adoption curve.

The honest note on the delivery: “I’d get out immediately” is unhedged advice from a paid presentation, without individual-circumstance caveats, and it is the one place the pitch’s otherwise careful hedging discipline drops. The facts are right; the framing is a sales device.

How to Read a Casualty List Honestly

A casualty list is a rhetorical structure, and it deserves a reader’s respect and suspicion in equal measure. The respect: naming specific large caps the system scores poorly is a genuinely bold move in a genre that prefers unnamed “hidden” winners, because the names carry public prices and public histories, and the list makes the system’s framework falsifiable as quarters pass; a screen of anonymous tickers proves nothing, while “sell Rivian” on a dated record is a testable claim. The suspicion: every list of losers is curated, and the honest questions are what did not make the list, how the scoring weights were chosen, and whether the same model run a year earlier would have produced names that have since recovered. The pitch’s strongest honest marker is that its casualty logic is thematic rather than scattergun: each name shares the workflow-exposure profile the system claims to detect, which means the list is at least an application of a stated framework rather than a grab bag of recent losers. That coherence is what earns the list a reading. Whether it earns the system a subscription is a separate question, answered by the same falsifiability over the coming quarters that any honest reader should want on the record.

What the Low Scores Claim to See

The Stansberry Score’s claim on the casualty side is the same as on the winners side: systematic early detection, “The higher the number, the more potential the stock has for growth and vice versa.” The honest limitation, which matters more on the sell side: a composite score built from observable factors (fundamentals deteriorating, money flow, sentiment) is describing the repricing that has already begun, which makes it a trend-follower in damaged names. It will flag Gartner after the plunge, not before. What it can do honestly is impose exit discipline, the thing paralyzed holders lack, and the pitch’s line for that discipline is its best: “the most expensive four words in investing can be, I’ll just hold on” belongs to this genre’s sell-side tradition.

What You Get

The N.E.W. System package: the quarterly portfolios, monthly updates, Stansberry Score access, Stansberry GPT, the Quick Start Guide, both reports (Riches and Casualties), and the mystery bonus. Price behind the order button, 30-day full refund with keep-the-reports. Details in the presentation. For the pairing, our Ripping Point Riches explainer covers the buy-side report, and our Rivian piece covers the free sell in depth.

The Honest Read

Ripping Point Casualties is the half of the offer most pitches omit, and the half that makes the other half credible: a system willing to publish its own casualty list is inviting you to check whether the flagged names keep falling. The demonstrations are real drawdowns, the free sell’s facts are right, and the discipline it sells (exits with reasons) is the thing retirement portfolios usually lack. The honest caveats: the score follows damage rather than anticipating it, the report names are behind the paywall, and “immediately” is never advice that fits everyone. The list is the product. The checking is free.

NewsletterVetter is an independent publication. We receive compensation from some of the services we review through affiliate links. Nothing on this site is investment advice. Always do your own research.