Weiss Bank Ratings: How the X-Lists Grade Your Bank

The most concrete product inside Dr. Martin Weiss’s “America’s Next Subprime Crisis” presentation is the Weiss bank ratings and the X-Lists built on them. The pitch’s offer includes “the precise names, state, and Weiss rating of the nation’s banks our data indicates are at the greatest risk of insolvency in this coming crisis,” alongside lists of the weakest and strongest insurers and a sell-hold-buy grade for every stock in the S&P 500.

If you have wondered how a private firm can rate every bank in America, here is how the system works and what it is worth.

The Ratings Model

Weiss Ratings has graded banks and insurers since 1971, and its differentiator is the business model: subscribers pay for the ratings, and the firm accepts no payment from the companies it grades. As Weiss puts it in the presentation: “I have never accepted a dime from the companies we rate, and I never will.” The big three agencies (Moody’s, S&P, Fitch) work on the issuer-pays model, which is the structural conflict the entire pitch is built around. Co-presenter Nilus Mattive, an agency veteran from the housing crisis, describes the insider mechanics: “Before a company’s rating was downgraded, it got advanced notice from the rating agency and had the opportunity to appeal the downgrade.”

The ratings themselves are letter grades computed from public regulatory filings: capitalization, asset quality, earnings, liquidity, and stability for banks; reserve adequacy and investment quality for insurers. The firm claims nearly 60,000 ratings across stocks, banks, insurers, ETFs, and mutual funds, updated in real time, and Safe Money Report subscribers get open access to the database.

The Track Record Claim

The credibility argument rests on named, dated warnings. The pitch cites advance warning on Bear Stearns “one hundred and two days before it imploded,” Lehman Brothers “one hundred and eighty one days in advance,” Citigroup “a hundred and ten days before its bailout,” and Fannie Mae “four years before its collapse.” The headline statistic: “Since 2008, there have been 549 bank failures and of those, Weiss Ratings has called ninety seven percent of them.” The failure count is public record; the 97% is the firm’s own metric, consistent with its long-published record though not independently re-derivable. External validation cited in the pitch includes a GAO study finding the firm “outperformed our largest competitor, AM Best, by a factor of three to one in identifying future financial failures for insurance companies.”

What the X-Lists Are and Are Not

The X-Lists are the packaged product form of the ratings: banks at greatest insolvency risk, weak insurers (including annuity issuers, the pitch teases that “some of them are names you would absolutely recognize”), and the S&P 500 graded sell, hold, or buy. What they are not: a trading service. The lists are protection tools, meant for checking where your own money sits. The pitch frames the use case exactly that way, “how to get out before the exit doors are slammed shut,” and answers the staleness objection directly: “When you join Safe Money, you also get open access to all our latest Weiss ratings online… nearly 60,000 Weiss ratings all updated in real time.” Our “Weiss Ratings X-List: The Sell-Rated Banks and Insurers” article covers the details.

How to Read Any Bank Grade

Whether you use Weiss’s grades or any other system, the honest way to consume them is as a screening input, not a verdict. A grade is a snapshot computed from filings: capital ratios, asset quality, earnings, liquidity. It tells you which institutions deserve a closer look in both directions, weak and strong. It does not tell you what happens next, because no rating system can. The discipline is to check the grade, then check the trend of the grade over time, and then ask why. A firm whose model publishes grades without taking issuer money simply removes one excuse for the middle step, which is the entire pitch in miniature. We break down that angle in our “Weiss Ratings Free: What You Get Without Paying” piece.

Why Bank Grades Are Having a Moment

The pitch lands in a market primed to hear it. The private credit stress events it documents are all real: First Brands Group’s September 2025 Chapter 11 with over $11 billion in liabilities and missing collateral, Tricolor’s double-pledged-collateral collapse and SEC fraud charges, the 5% withdrawal cap at BlackRock’s $26 billion HPS fund, and the repurchase cap backlogs at Blackstone’s BCRED. The pitch’s thesis is that this credit stress eventually reaches banks through their own lending books and their fund relationships, so knowing which banks are rated weak matters before, not after. That is a forecast; the value of a bank-grade database does not depend on it, which is the honest strength of the product.

For the protective playbook these pitches converge on, see our guide to portfolio protection strategies for a shaky market, and for the insurance side of the X-Lists, our piece on how annuities work and what they really cost. For the parallel hidden-risk argument, see subprime AI debt inside the AI bubble warnings.

The X-Lists come inside a $49 trial year of the Safe Money Report with a 12-month, no-questions-asked refund window, and you keep the reports even if you take the refund. You can review the offer here.

A 55-year-old independent bank-rating database is the rare newsletter bonus with standalone utility: even if you never believe a word of the crisis forecast, knowing your own bank’s grade is worth forty-nine dollars of curiosity.

NewsletterVetter is an independent publication. We receive compensation from some of the services we review through affiliate links. Nothing on this site is investment advice. Always do your own research.