Elon Musk AI Stock: What Jovine’s 100X Pitch Actually Is

“Elon Musk AI stock” is one of those search terms that means too many things. It can mean Tesla, the only public Musk company with a big AI program. It can mean SpaceX, public since June. It can mean xAI, which is private and therefore not buyable at any price. And lately it means Dylan Jovine’s “Elon’s 100X AI Stock” presentation from Behind the Markets, which teases something entirely different from all three. Let us clear up what that pitch actually is, because the answer is more interesting than the headline suggests.

What the Pitch Is Not

The 100X pitch does not sell you a Musk company. Jovine is explicit that his pick is an unnamed chip supplier that Musk’s ventures license from, with the name, ticker, and buy instructions gated behind the first report in a $49 subscription. The first thing an honest review should say is what the pitch actually claims: “There is one AI company that Elon needs for his massive satellite fleet… There’s just one thing he can’t build himself. The chip that runs them.”

The Thesis, Step by Step

The argument runs in five layers, and each layer deserves separate scrutiny.

1. The demand wall is real. “The four biggest names in tech, Microsoft, Amazon, Google and Meta, are pouring a combined $725 billion into AI infrastructure in 2026 alone,” with 16 gigawatts of new U.S. data center capacity opening this year.

2. The power bottleneck is real. Morgan Stanley projects a 49-gigawatt electricity shortfall for data centers by 2028. Google, the pitch says, waits up to 12 years for grid hookups. Denver, Oklahoma City, and Tulsa have paused new data centers; Maine’s legislature voted to ban them. This is documented industry-wide, not pitch invention.

3. The orbital answer is Musk’s stated plan. The pitch quotes him: “The cheapest place to put AI will be in space within 36 months or less,” and points to the AI1 satellite with 230-foot solar wings, longer than a Boeing 747’s wingspan. Orbital solar generates roughly eight times the energy of ground panels, and the 250-below-zero environment is free cooling. The race is real: Nvidia-backed Starcloud trained the first AI model in space, Bezos is pouring $1 billion a year into Blue Origin, and Google’s Project Suncatcher is underway. See our piece on orbital data centers as an investment theme for the fuller map.

4. The scale request is filed. “SpaceX asks the FCC for permission to launch one million satellites,” versus roughly 10,000 today. Hence the 100X name: Jovine’s “research indicates that Elon’s bill to this firm could soon get a LOT bigger. 100X bigger.” Note what the claim actually is: a revenue inference from a filed request, not a price target. That is structurally more defensible than most 100X headlines, though it still assumes the fleet gets built and the royalty math scales linearly.

5. The supplier gets paid either way. The core line: “Elon doesn’t own that chip. He licenses it. That means, every time a Tesla rolls off the line… Every time SpaceX launches an AI1 satellite… This company gets paid.” A royalty-per-unit model means the supplier collects whether the satellites launch on schedule or not, as long as Teslas keep rolling and Starlink keeps shipping.

The Clues, and the Honest Flag

The company is unnamed, but the pitch leaves a fingerprint: designs running Tesla vehicles since 2012 (“Elon has been quietly paying this obscure firm since 2012”), data center royalties that “more than doubled last year… And they more than doubled the year before that,” a blocked NVIDIA acquisition attempt (Amazon and Samsung filed objections, Musk “personally raised the alarm,” regulators killed the deal over “national security concerns”), one giant shareholder controlling the vast majority of the stock with “only a sliver” trading publicly, and institutional positions of $675 million, $349 million, and $343 million. The clues point toward a chip-IP licensor. We will say it plainly: the identification is unconfirmed, and no article of ours will assert a name the pitch itself withholds. Readers deserve that honesty from us just as they expect hedging from presenters.

The December 8th Deadline

The event the pitch anchors to is the final SpaceX lockup tranche: on December 8th, “the last block of roughly 800 million insider shares comes loose, all at once,” more than $100 billion at the IPO price. Jovine argues freed insider money flows to the suppliers insiders know: “when insiders finally get their money, it rarely sits still.” The conventional reading of a lockup expiry is supply pressure, and the pitch never engages that counter-argument, though Jovine does hedge consistently with “I believe” and “in my opinion.” We broke down the event in our SpaceX lockup expiration coverage.

Who This Suits, and Who It Does Not

This pitch suits investors comfortable buying a researched thesis before it is independently verifiable, inside a cheap, well-guaranteed wrapper: $49 for a year, six-month full refund, keep the reports, A+ BBB rating. Jovine’s dated calls (Rocket Lab under $4 at a 3,850% peak, Palantir at $7, Micron at $54) give the method some credibility. It does not suit anyone who needs the company named and audited before committing a dollar, and the modest $5,000-to-$25,000 outcome framing near the close is more grounded than the headline suggests. If you want to weigh the argument yourself, the full presentation is here.

NewsletterVetter is an independent publication. We receive compensation from some of the services we review through affiliate links. Nothing on this site is investment advice. Always do your own research.