Elon’s 100X AI Stock: The Dylan Jovine Pitch, Decoded

“Elon’s 100X AI Stock” is the coined phrase at the center of Dylan Jovine’s new Behind the Markets presentation, and it is doing exactly what a signature phrase is designed to do: it names the promise, credits the authority, and spreads as a search term all at once. If you have seen the headline, “Former Wall Street Insider Who Called Rocket Lab at $4, Palantir at $7 and Micron at $54 Reveals… ELON’S 100X AI STOCK,” here is where the phrase comes from, what it actually stands for, and our honest read of what checks out.

Where the Phrase Appears in the Presentation

The name is not just a headline. Jovine explains it on the page: “And here’s why I call it Elon’s 100X AI Stock… My research indicates that Elon’s bill to this firm could soon get a LOT bigger. 100X bigger.” That is the whole claim compressed into five words. The phrase then repeats as a refrain through roughly two dozen iterations, welding the 100X math to Musk’s name to the reader’s “second chance.”

The firm in question is unnamed. The pitch’s description of it is the actual hook: “Elon has been quietly paying this obscure firm since 2012… Now his biggest venture to date could send shares soaring starting on DECEMBER 8th.” The name and ticker sit inside Report #1, titled “Elon’s 100X AI Stock: The Chip Elon Can’t Fly Without,” which comes with the subscription.

What the 100X Actually Measures

This is the part worth decoding carefully, because the claim is better constructed than the headline implies. The 100X is not a price target. It is a revenue inference drawn from a filed request: “SpaceX asks the FCC for permission to launch one million satellites,” versus “about 10,000 satellites in orbit” today. As the pitch puts it, Musk “wants to launch 100X more satellites than he currently owns,” and therefore “he could soon face a 100 times bigger bill to this company.”

The logic runs through the supplier. “He has the rockets. He has the launch sites. He has the AI… There’s just one thing he can’t build himself. The chip that runs them.” And the money line: “Elon doesn’t own that chip. He licenses it. That means, every time a Tesla rolls off the line… Every time SpaceX launches an AI1 satellite… This company gets paid.” A royalty-per-unit supplier collects on every unit shipped, so a 100X fleet implies, in Jovine’s reasoning, a proportionally larger royalty bill.

Why does the fleet need to exist at all? Because terrestrial AI is running into a wall: Microsoft, Amazon, Google, and Meta are spending $725 billion on AI infrastructure this year, while Morgan Stanley projects a 49-gigawatt power shortfall for data centers by 2028, Google waits up to 12 years for grid hookups, and towns from Denver to Tulsa have paused or banned new data centers. Musk’s stated answer, quoted twice in the pitch: “The cheapest place to put AI will be in space within 36 months or less.” The orbital option gets you eight times the solar energy per panel and a 250-degrees-below-zero environment for free cooling.

The December 8th Device

The date in the headline is the final SpaceX lockup tranche. “On December 8th, the lockup runs out. The last block of roughly 800 million insider shares comes loose, all at once. That’s more than $100 billion at the IPO price.” Jovine’s spin: “when insiders finally get their money, it rarely sits still. It goes looking for the next big idea, usually one they already know from the inside. In my opinion, a big chunk of it lands in Elon’s 100X AI Stock.” The same date drives the sibling Space Millionaires campaign, and we covered the event mechanics in our SpaceX lockup expiration analysis, with the orbital thesis mapped in our orbital data center theme piece.

Our Honest Take: What Checks Out

The verifiable layers hold. The grid bottleneck is documented industry-wide, not pitch invention. The orbital data center race is real, with Nvidia-backed Starcloud having trained the first AI model in space, Bezos committing $1 billion a year to Blue Origin, and Google’s Project Suncatcher in motion. Chip licensing is a genuine, well-understood royalty business. Jovine’s own record is dated and checkable: Rocket Lab under $4 (3,850% peak), Palantir at $7, Micron at $54, plus closed trades in AMD and ASML.

What does not check out, because it cannot: anything specific to the unnamed firm. The 2012 Tesla relationship, the doubling data center royalties, the blocked NVIDIA acquisition, the $675 million institutional position. The clues point toward a chip-IP licensor; the identification is unconfirmed, and we treat it that way. The one outcome framed in dollars is modest by genre standards: “Even a 400% move from here would turn $5,000 into $25,000. But only until December 8th.”

Where to Learn More

The offer is $49 for a year of Behind the Markets (listed regular price $399), with a six-month full-refund guarantee and four research reports including the one naming the stock. If the decoded argument interests you, watch the full presentation here and judge it with the fine print in view.

NewsletterVetter is an independent publication. We receive compensation from some of the services we review through affiliate links. Nothing on this site is investment advice. Always do your own research.