NVIDIA Tried to Buy This Company: Elon Killed the Deal

“NVIDIA Tried to Buy This Company. Elon Stepped In to Kill the Deal.” It is one of the most striking lines in Dylan Jovine’s “Elon’s 100X AI Stock” presentation, and it does a lot of work in one sentence: it implies the teased company is valuable enough for the world’s most valuable chip firm to want, independent enough that its independence survived, and central enough to Musk’s plans that he would intervene. Here is where the phrase appears, what the pitch actually claims around it, and our honest read.

Where the Phrase Appears in the Presentation

The line arrives in the section explaining why almost nobody on Wall Street has figured out the supplier story. The pitch’s account, in its own words: “NVIDIA tried to buy it outright… Jeff Bezos’ Amazon filed an objection with the U.S. government. Samsung filed one too. And Elon Musk personally raised the alarm… In the end, regulators killed the deal… Due to reasons of ‘national security concerns.’”

That is a compressed retelling of a real category of event: regulators blocking a semiconductor acquisition after objections from rivals and national-security reviewers. The pitch uses it to argue the teased company could not be bought even by the deepest pockets in tech, which supports the durability of its licensing franchise. If NVIDIA could not acquire it, the reasoning goes, no one can, and the royalty stream stays independent.

The Context Around the Claim

The claim sits inside the pitch’s larger supplier thesis. Musk, the pitch says, has been “quietly paying this obscure firm since 2012” for the chip architecture that runs his fleet: “Elon doesn’t own that chip. He licenses it. That means, every time a Tesla rolls off the line… Every time SpaceX launches an AI1 satellite… This company gets paid.” The scale-up that turns this from a steady royalty into a “100X” story is a filed request: “SpaceX asks the FCC for permission to launch one million satellites,” versus roughly 10,000 in orbit today, so “he could soon face a 100 times bigger bill to this company.”

The setting is the orbital AI data center race, which the pitch grounds in verifiable forces: $725 billion of hyperscaler AI capex in 2026, a projected 49-gigawatt power shortfall for data centers by 2028 (Morgan Stanley), grid waits of up to 12 years for companies like Google, and municipal bans on new data center construction. Musk’s quoted answer: “The cheapest place to put AI will be in space within 36 months or less.” Every AI1 satellite, the pitch argues, carries the licensed chip, so every launch writes the supplier a royalty check.

Our Honest Read: What Checks Out

Several layers of this hold up to scrutiny. Regulators blocking chip-sector acquisitions over national-security concerns is a real and well-documented pattern. Chip licensing as a business model is real: architecture licensors collect per-unit royalties across nearly every device category, which is exactly the structure the pitch describes. The orbital data center race is real, with the Nvidia-backed Starcloud having trained the first AI model in space and Google’s Project Suncatcher underway. And the strategic logic of the claim is sound: a company that survived an acquisition attempt by the world’s most aggressive acquirer of AI assets, with multiple rivals objecting, has demonstrated its independence in the strongest way a business can.

What we flag honestly: the specific deal the pitch describes cannot be verified, because the company is unnamed. The clues point toward a chip-IP licensor; that identification is unconfirmed, and we will not assert a name the pitch withholds. Readers should also note the flip side of the claim: if regulators once blocked an acquisition of this company, that same regulatory posture is part of why one giant shareholder “still controls the vast majority of the stock. Only a sliver trades in public,” per the pitch, which cuts both ways for a small investor, scarcity of float on one side, limited liquidity on the other.

The Event the Pitch Ties It To

The deadline threaded through the presentation is December 8th, the final SpaceX lockup tranche: “the last block of roughly 800 million insider shares comes loose, all at once. That’s more than $100 billion at the IPO price.” Jovine’s thesis is that newly liquid insider money flows toward the suppliers those insiders know best: “In my opinion, a big chunk of it lands in Elon’s 100X AI Stock.” We examined that event in detail in our SpaceX lockup expiration analysis, and the supplier-school of Musk investing in our coverage of Jovine’s Superdeal pick, with the broader theme in our orbital data center piece.

Where to Learn More

The full story of the blocked deal, the company, and the ticker sits inside Report #1, “Elon’s 100X AI Stock: The Chip Elon Can’t Fly Without,” included with a $49 one-year Behind the Markets subscription that carries a six-month full-refund guarantee. If you want to hear the claim in the presenter’s own framing, the full presentation is here.

NewsletterVetter is an independent publication. We receive compensation from some of the services we review through affiliate links. Nothing on this site is investment advice. Always do your own research.