Why the U.S. Is Rebuilding Rare Earths
For most of the last three decades, the rare-earths supply chain has run through one country. China refines roughly 94% of the world’s magnet supply, which means the neodymium and praseodymium that go into electric motors, wind turbines, and military hardware are processed where Beijing can watch, tax, or restrict them. Washington has spent years trying to unwind that dependence, and the money is now flowing to the handful of American deposits that could eventually compete.
That is the backdrop for the American rare-earths push, and it is why a small Wyoming project named Bear Lodge keeps showing up in investor pitches. The Critical Assets launch from Brownstone Research, edited by Dave Forest, points subscribers at the company that owns Bear Lodge: Rare Element Resources (REEMF). We have written about Brownstone Research’s track record before, and the Wyoming angle is worth understanding on its own.
The Pick: Rare Element Resources
Rare Element Resources is a pre-revenue junior developer, which is a polite way of saying it has not sold a single pound of separated rare earths yet. Its main asset is the Bear Lodge Project in northeast Wyoming, a deposit rich in neodymium and praseodymium, the two metals in the strongest permanent magnets. The ore also carries samarium, terbium, cerium, lanthanum, yttrium, gadolinium, europium, and dysprosium, a basket that matters because separating all of them is what a profitable operation needs.
The ownership is the interesting part. Defense contractor General Atomics owns roughly 70% of the company through its Synchron subsidiary. That is a serious backer with a long horizon, and it changes the risk math for a penny stock. A company 70% owned by a defense giant is unlikely to quietly vanish, even if the share price swings hard.
The Timeline Is the Story
This is where the pitch and the reality diverge. The promo frames Bear Lodge as an imminent catalyst story. A demonstration plant, designed to produce up to 10 tons of separated neodymium-praseodymium oxide over roughly ten months, is expected late this summer, and the project won a FAST-41 “Covered Project” designation in March 2026, a federal label that puts it on a faster permitting track.
Those are real milestones. They are also early ones. Full federal and state permits are not expected until early 2028, and a realistic mining start is late 2029 into 2030. That is a four-year gap between the demo plant and actual production, and it is the gap where junior miners fund themselves by selling shares.
How the Buildout Actually Works
A domestic rare-earths industry is not just a mine. It is three steps stacked together: mining the ore, separating the mixed concentrate into individual oxides, and turning those oxides into magnets. The United States has made progress on the first two steps, mostly through a handful of established and emerging operators, but the magnet step, the highest-value and hardest part, remains concentrated in Asia.
That is why a demo plant matters more than it sounds. Rare Element Resources is not just trying to dig a hole in Wyoming. It is trying to prove that an American operation can separate neodymium and praseodymium at a commercial grade and cost. Ten tons over ten months is tiny next to global demand, but it exists to de-risk the much bigger plant that would follow permits in 2028. If the demo works, the financing conversation changes. If it does not, the stock gives back whatever the promo hype added.
What the Price Already Shows
The stock traded around $1.31 at the August 18 close. The promo teases it “below $1,” and it did sit near $0.80 a week earlier. But the launch’s own attention drove an intraday spike to $2.00, which is the quiet irony of these campaigns: the “under $1 entry” disappears the moment the crowd hears about it. The SpaceX supplier narrative is doing a lot of work here, because Bear Lodge is not actually selling to SpaceX. It is not selling to anyone yet.
The American rare-earths buildout is real, and Wyoming has a genuine seat at it. Bear Lodge is a real deposit with a serious owner and a real, if slow, path to production. The question for an investor is whether the price already assumes success that is still four years and several dilutive capital raises away.
The Strategic Case vs. the Stock Case
It helps to keep the two arguments separate. The strategic case for American rare earths is straightforward: no serious country wants its magnets, and therefore its motors, turbines, and weapons, dependent on a single rival supplier. That case gets stronger every time China tightens export controls, and it justifies a lot of patient capital.
The stock case is narrower. It asks whether Rare Element Resources, at its current share count and price, is the best vehicle for that thesis. A company that is 70% owned by General Atomics, four years from production, and already spiked on promo attention may be a good strategic story and still a demanding entry price. The two questions are related, but they are not the same question, and confusing them is how investors overpay for a good theme.
Ready to see the research? Click here to access Dave Forest’s report.
NewsletterVetter is an independent publication. We receive compensation from some of the services we review through affiliate links. Nothing on this site is investment advice. Always do your own research.