The SpaceX IPO and the Critical Assets Supercycle
The Brownstone Research Critical Assets launch opens with a big, real event: the SpaceX IPO. The pitch calls it a “SpaceX Supercycle,” then pivots quickly away from rockets and toward a metal. Here is how the argument actually works, and where it strains.
SpaceX going public matters for a concrete reason. It converts a private company’s valuation into a public one, and it gives ordinary investors a way to own a piece of the most watched private company in the world. The Kiyosaki space economy promos leaned on the same event, as we covered in our look at the SpaceX IPO angle. But the Critical Assets version takes a different turn.
From Rockets to Robots to Metal
The Critical Assets thesis does not actually depend on rockets. It depends on robots. The argument runs like this: the same industrial base that launches rockets also builds humanoid robots, and those robots need permanent magnets, and those magnets need neodymium. The metal, not the rocket, is the investment.
The link to SpaceX is more thematic than financial. SpaceX is a buyer of aluminum and other materials, but the supercycle story is really an Optimus robot story. Each Optimus robot is estimated to need about 7.5 pounds of magnets. Extrapolate that across the roadmap Elon Musk has described and you get to a claim of 3.4 million tons of magnets, which the promo says would be 26 times current global output.
That number is the load-bearing assumption, and it deserves scrutiny. It is a stacked extrapolation: robot production volumes that do not yet exist, multiplied by magnet content per robot, compared against current supply. Each link in the chain is plausible in isolation. Stacked together, they produce a figure that looks engineered to sound enormous. Our piece on the Optimus robot story walks through the robot side of that math.
Where the Metal Comes From
The other half of the thesis is supply. China controls roughly 94% of the world’s magnet supply. If robot-driven demand actually materialized, the West would need magnets from somewhere other than China. That is the strategic case for domestic rare earth production, and it is the part of the argument that holds up best.
The promo funnels this into a specific pick, a Wyoming rare earth developer called Rare Element Resources, and a freebie in Alcoa. Alcoa is the vertically integrated aluminum giant, trading around $50 a share with roughly a $13 billion market cap and about 9 times forward earnings. It is one of the world’s largest bauxite miners and alumina refiners. The aluminum angle is the SpaceX-adjacent bet: rockets and robots both consume aluminum, and Alcoa is also pressured right now by energy costs and Strait of Hormuz shipping disruption.
The Numbers You Should Actually See
The Critical Assets pitch advertises a 39X return “in under two years,” described as “extremely conservative.” The historical comps it cites are the usual promotional yardsticks: a 4,344% uranium trade, a 340X called “FSY,” a 1,700X Paladin Energy, a 40,000X “TMRC.” These are the kind of figures that only appear in hindsight, on picks that were not held by anyone in size.
There is also the “7.92 million tons of tech metals” figure. That is ore at a 3.97% total rare earth oxide grade, not finished metal. The distinction matters. Ore is not a product you can sell into a magnet factory; it is a starting material that still needs separation, and separation is exactly the step China controls.
The editor behind all this, Dave Forest, is a genuine resource veteran. He started Casey Energy Speculator in 2004 and surfaced Lynas Resources, the Australian rare earths developer that became one of the few real non-China producers. That background is the reason this pitch should not be dismissed out of hand, even when the headline numbers do not survive contact.
The Verdict
The SpaceX IPO is real and consequential. The strategic case for domestic rare earth production is real and getting stronger. The specific bridge between those two things, that a robot supercycle will create a 39X return in under two years, is the weak part of the structure. The offer costs $2,250 a year with no refunds, and the 90-day “guarantee” returns Brownstone Research credit, not cash.
The honest read is that the event is real, the metal is real, and the multiple is marketing. If you want the SpaceX exposure, there are simpler ways to think about it. If you want the rare earth thesis, understand that you are buying a multi-year supply chain bet, not a two-year trade.
Ready to see the research? Click here to access Dave Forest’s report.
NewsletterVetter is an independent publication. We receive compensation from some of the services we review through affiliate links. Nothing on this site is investment advice. Always do your own research.