The managed-futures sleeve is the least intuitive part of the “Crack-Up Boom” pitch, and it is the most interesting. Most of the presentation is about owning hard assets that hold value. Managed futures are different. They are a trading strategy built to profit from price trends in either direction across commodities, currencies, and interest rates, and the pitch’s real claim is that this strategy is uncorrelated to stocks and bonds. The vehicle it points to is the iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF), and the honest question is whether that claim actually holds up.
What Managed Futures Are
Managed futures is the name for a style of investing that has existed for decades, largely among commodity trading advisers, firms that run systematic trend-following strategies for institutions and wealthy individuals. The core idea is simple. Markets trend, and a disciplined strategy that follows those trends, buying what is rising and shorting what is falling, can profit in both up and down markets. Because it trades everything from oil to currencies to bonds, its returns do not depend on the stock market going up.
That uncorrelation is the entire point. In a normal portfolio, stocks and bonds tend to move together in a stress, and an asset that does not is genuinely valuable. The SG CTA index, which tracks the returns of the largest managed-futures funds, produced positive returns in 2002 and 2008, the two market crashes where diversification was supposed to pay. That is the honest, verifiable core of the pitch’s claim.
How the Fund Emulates the Strategy
DBMF is an unusual product called an emulation fund. Rather than hiring its own traders, it tries to replicate the average portfolio of the twenty largest managed-futures hedge funds, using publicly available data and a time lag. The idea is to give ordinary investors an index fund for a category that is normally expensive and locked behind high minimums and performance fees. It is a clever construction, and it is the reason the pitch can offer managed futures to a retail subscriber at all.
The trade-off is tracking error. An emulation fund follows its target with a delay and an approximation, so its returns will not perfectly match the strategy it copies. That is the honest caveat the pitch glosses over. The 2002 result it cites belongs to the index, not to DBMF, which did not exist in 2002. The direction is right. The precision is not. We decoded the fund itself in our DBMF explainer and our managed futures ETF explainer.
What Actually Checks Out
The managed-futures claim is the strongest in the entire pitch when judged on its own terms. The strategy really is uncorrelated to stocks and bonds, the SG CTA index really did make money in 2002 and 2008, and DBMF really is a reasonable low-cost way to access the category. It is not a hard asset in the same sense as farmland or silver, but it plays the same role in a crisis portfolio, a source of returns that does not depend on the dollar holding up.
The honest caveat is the usual one for this pitch. The presentation offers no performance accountability, every pick is marked “N/A” in its table, and it admits “anybody who gives you a date is lying to you.” The strategy’s history is real. The urgency wrapped around it is not. We placed the sleeve in the full basket in our alternative investments explainer.
Trend Following in a Crisis
The reason managed futures shine in exactly the moments the pitch is worried about comes down to what trend following actually does. The strategy does not predict anything. It reacts, building positions in whatever is rising and shorting whatever is falling, and holding those positions as long as the trend persists. In a crisis, when currencies, commodities, and rates all move in large, sustained waves, a trend follower has exactly the environment it is built for.
That is why the SG CTA index made money in 2002 and 2008. Those were not years when the managers got lucky on a stock pick. They were years when markets moved decisively in one direction across many assets, and a systematic strategy that follows those moves captured the swings. The honest corollary is that trend following earns its keep in the crashes and tends to lag in the calm, grinding markets in between, which is the price of the uncorrelation the pitch is selling.
The Honest Bottom Line
Managed futures are a genuinely smart addition to a crisis-minded portfolio, and DBMF is one of the few low-cost ways for ordinary investors to hold the strategy. If the “Crack-Up Boom” basket has a sleeve that earns its place on the merits rather than the fear, it is this one. The caveat is that you are buying an emulation, with tracking error and a lag, not a guaranteed replay of 2002.
The offer is The Ferris Report at $129 for the first year, renewing at $199, with a 30-day refund and a seven-stock “Capitalism in Crisis Portfolio.” The uncorrelated-return idea is worth taking seriously. Just know you are buying the strategy, not the backtest.
Ready to see the research? Click here to view the Crack-Up Boom presentation.
NewsletterVetter is an independent publication. We receive compensation from some of the services we review through affiliate links. Nothing on this site is investment advice. Always do your own research.