The silver number in the “Crack-Up Boom” pitch is one of the most quotable statistics in the presentation: silver “rose more 38 times in value” during the 1970s. It is not a lie, but it is a number doing a specific job. It takes one extraordinary decade, strips out the reasons that decade happened, and implies the same thing is about to happen again. Checking the claim means walking through what actually happened to silver in the 1970s, and what that means for anyone holding the metal today.
What Actually Happened in the 1970s
The 1970s silver story is really three stories stacked on top of each other. The first was the collapse of Bretton Woods, the system that had pegged the dollar to gold since 1944. When the United States ended the dollar’s convertibility into gold in 1971, hard money lost its anchor, and both gold and silver began a long repricing. The second was a genuine decade of inflation, with oil shocks and rising prices pushing people into hard assets. The third, and most dramatic, was the 1979 to 1980 spike, driven in large part by the Hunt brothers’ attempt to corner the silver market, which drove the price to a peak it would not see again for decades.
All three contributed to the 38x move, but only the first two are repeatable in any meaningful sense. The Hunt corner was a one-off manipulation, and it ended in collapse when the brothers could not meet margin calls. Strip that out, and silver’s rise is still real but far less spectacular.
Why the Number Does Not Transfer
The pitch uses the 38x figure as a template, implying that a coming currency crisis will produce a similar run. But the 1970s silver boom was the product of a specific historical sequence: the end of a global monetary system, a decade of inflation, and a failed corner. Those conditions are not on offer today in the same form. After the 1980 peak, silver spent roughly four decades flat in inflation-adjusted terms, which is the part of the story the pitch leaves out.
That is the honest problem with the claim. It is accurate history with a misleading implication. The metal can serve as a store of value and a crisis hedge without ever repeating its 1970s performance, and an investor who buys silver expecting a 38x replay is buying a memory, not a forecast. We expanded on the mechanism in our silver coverage and our precious metals stocks explainer.
The Miners vs. the Metal
There is a second layer worth untangling. The “38 times” figure describes the price of silver, the metal. The pitch also floats a vaguer promise of “thousands of percent” gains via “The Silver Trade,” which is a very different claim. Silver mining stocks are geared plays on the metal price, and a rising silver price can produce outsized gains in small miners, but those same miners can be wiped out when the price falls. The metal and the miners are different investments with different risk profiles, and the pitch slides between them.
For a crisis-minded buyer, the physical metal or a physical silver fund is the store of value. The miners are the speculation. The pitch wants the safety story of the first and the upside of the second in the same breath, which we separated in our silver ETF explainer.
The Miners as the Amplified Play
The pitch’s vaguer promise of “thousands of percent” gains points toward a different investment entirely, the silver miners, and it is worth understanding how different they are from the metal. A miner’s earnings are tied directly to the silver price. When silver rises, a miner’s profit can rise far faster, because the cost of digging stays roughly fixed while the revenue per ounce climbs. That amplification is what produces the outsized gains the pitch is really dangling.
The flip side is that the same amplification works in reverse. A miner that swings up dramatically on a silver rally can be wiped out on a silver slump, and mining carries its own risks, exploration failures, permitting, labor, and debt, that the metal itself never faces. The pitch slides between the safety story of physical silver and the upside story of the miners, using the metal’s credibility to sell the miners’ risk. A careful reader keeps the two firmly separate.
The Honest Bottom Line
The 38x claim is real history, and it deserves to be acknowledged as such. Silver genuinely did rise that much in the 1970s, and a store of value in hard metal is a defensible position in an uncertain currency environment. What the claim does not do is predict the future. The decade that produced it was unique, and silver has spent the last four decades proving it was not a template. We covered the full hard-asset basket in our inflation hedge explainer.
The offer is The Ferris Report at $129 for the first year, renewing at $199, with a 30-day refund and a seven-stock “Capitalism in Crisis Portfolio.” Hold silver if you want protection. Do not buy it expecting the 1970s to repeat on schedule.
Ready to see the research? Click here to view the Crack-Up Boom presentation.
NewsletterVetter is an independent publication. We receive compensation from some of the services we review through affiliate links. Nothing on this site is investment advice. Always do your own research.