The $10 Trillion Energy Stone Review: Is Junior Resource Monthly Worth It?

“The $10 Trillion Energy Stone” is how Gerardo Del Real is framing uranium this cycle, and it is a good wrapper for a story that has been told several times before. The pitch opens on a countdown: a “supply shock hitting just days ago,” Microsoft’s “largest single energy commitment in its fifty-year history,” and a single American facility “shut down and left for dead” that is now being restarted. The substance underneath all of it is uranium, and the argument is that we have entered what Del Real calls a “Third Convergence Event,” the moment where tightening supply meets a brand new buyer in Big Tech.

We took the presentation apart, checked the paper trail it leans on, and worked through the teased picks one by one. Here is what we found.

The Presenter

Gerardo Del Real is a credible voice in this corner of the market, and that matters before anything else. He has spent three decades in resource exploration and won a Quebec Discovery of the Year award, the kind of industry recognition junior miners actually care about, and he has been involved with juniors that reached production rather than just promoted drill programs. When he talks about the uranium cycle he is speaking from inside it, not reading a script, and that is part of why this pitch deserves a careful read instead of a quick dismissal.

His home turf is junior mining, the sub-dollar explorers and developers that most retail newsletters will not touch because they are too small and too volatile. That focus is his edge and also his risk profile. His letter’s core discipline is buying explorers before a discovery is derisked and selling into the news, a strategy that only works with a genuine geological edge and the patience to sit through long, quiet stretches between drill results. He runs the Junior Resource Monthly letter under the Resource Stock Digest umbrella, and this is not his first uranium rodeo. He has pitched the uranium setup repeatedly over the past few years under names like “Texas Rich” and “Nuclear Melt Up,” which tells you two things: the thesis has staying power, and the “energy stone” wrapper is partly a rebrand of an argument he has been making since the sector was cheaper. We have covered another of his promotions, the Junior Resource Speculator’s “America’s Secret Vault” pitch, and the same voice comes through here: specific names, real geology, and an honest eye on the downside.

The Big Idea

The big idea is a supply squeeze with a new buyer at the table. The last two “Convergence Events” in uranium, Del Real says, did not produce 200% or 500% gains. “They gained tens of thousands of percent,” and “a single thousand-dollar stake turned into more than a million.” The mechanism is familiar to anyone who has followed the fuel: Russian uranium is being cut off from Western markets, the megatons-to-megawatts downblending program that quietly fed American reactors from dismantled Soviet warheads ended back in 2013, and the West let its domestic mining capacity wither during the cheap natural gas years. Now demand is firming as American reactors reopen and new ones get planned, and Big Tech is entering as a deep-pocketed buyer of carbon-free, around-the-clock baseload power.

The new wrinkle is that buyer. Microsoft’s deal to sponsor the restart of Constellation Energy’s surviving Three Mile Island reactor is a signed, observable commitment of Big Tech money to nuclear power. The Pentagon has moved microreactor pilot programs forward under the Project Pele and Janus programs. The Department of Energy’s strategic uranium reserve designation is a real policy signal that Washington wants domestic fuel supply. The thesis is not speculation on every front: the direction is real.

Del Real then walks through the December 2022 announcement that named five companies as strategic suppliers to the U.S. Strategic Uranium Reserve: Uranium Energy Corp (UEC), enCore Energy (EU), Energy Fuels (UUUU), Ur-Energy (URG), and Peninsula Energy (PEN). He says “only one of those five companies is worth investing in,” then narrows to what he calls “three specific small companies” plus a bonus exploration name. The reserve designation matters for a specific reason: it means the U.S. government, not just utilities, has started buying domestic uranium, which puts a policy backstop under exactly the kind of small American producers Del Real favors.

The Key Claims

The emotional core is a history lesson with an enormous denominator. “They gained tens of thousands of percent.” “A single thousand-dollar stake turned into more than a million.” Those numbers are real things that happened in uranium, but they happened in the early-2000s Chinese resource boom that peaked around 2007 and in the pre-Fukushima run that ended in 2011. Both were one-off supply-and-demand dislocations, not a repeatable template, and the 2011 crash that followed is a standing reminder of how fast a “convergence” can reverse when sentiment shifts on a single event. Del Real’s own track record is candid about that risk, to his credit.

The tease breaks into four names, each with a distinct job in the portfolio. The first pick is the “safest way” to own the story: “American through and through, with active production across the Colorado Plateau and the Wyoming basin, and multiple licensed uranium processing facilities already up and running.” That points at a producer, not a junior, and it is already covered on our site. The second pick is the high-upside exploration position, a junior with “one of the largest uranium-prospective land positions held by any junior in the entire sector,” spanning “two of the world’s most prolific uranium discovery basins,” cashed up and currently drilling. The third pick is “not a miner at all” but “a way to own the uranium itself,” tens of millions of pounds physically sitting in licensed storage, tradeable under a regular ticker. The bonus pick is “one more junior uranium play,” a small explorer with dozens of properties “drilling right now.”

The “only one of five is worth investing in” line deserves a note. It uses the scarcity of the five-name strategic list to build authority, then quietly sells three core picks plus a bonus name. The “only one” filter is a rhetorical device, not an actual screen.

The Free Tickers

Del Real does not name his picks on camera; the resolutions come from reading the clue structure against what each company actually does. Two of the four are genuinely new names for us, and both are exploration juniors.

The first is ATHA Energy, which trades as SASKF on the OTC market and SASK.V in Canada. It holds roughly seven million acres across the Athabasca Basin in Saskatchewan, home of the Cameco mines, and the Thelon Basin in Nunavut, which has seen a string of high-grade discoveries. The company raised money earlier this year to fund its exploration program and still carries about $50 million in cash against a market cap around $190 million. The tease price was $0.58; the November 5, 2026 close was $0.55. One important caveat: the tease summary lists no dated entry point, so these are current-reference “buy zone” prices rather than a historical tease with a track record to audit.

The second is Skyharbour Resources, SYHBF on the OTC and SYH.V in Canada, a small explorer with 43 projects now grown to 49 inside the Athabasca Basin, flagship names at Russell Lake and Moore Lake, and a market cap around $50 million. The tease price was $0.25; the November 5 close was $0.24. Skyharbour has been an exploration story for a decade and the stock has gone essentially sideways in that time, which is itself a signal about how often a big portfolio of “shots on goal” converts into shareholder returns.

We flag both names as high-confidence resolutions rather than confirmed reveals. Neither company has production or proven, economically viable reserves, and the “in-ground resource value” framing the pitch uses to make them look cheap conflates historical and inferred resources with reserves you can actually mine profitably. That distinction is the single most important thing to understand before buying either one.

The other two teased picks are already covered here. The physical uranium trust leg, Sprott Physical Uranium Trust (SRUUF), is the cleaner, lower-risk way to own the fuel itself, and we have a dedicated explainer on how the trust works and the NAV discount it trades at. The producer leg, Uranium Energy Corp, sits inside our Terrestrial Nuclear Renaissance teardown, and we have also covered Ur-Energy, one of the same five strategic suppliers Del Real references.

What You Get

Junior Resource Monthly is priced at $199 for the first year, renewing at $249, with a 30-day refund period. For that you get the monthly letter, Del Real’s model portfolio of junior resource names, and the bonus reports that accompany this specific promotion, including the three core uranium picks and the bonus exploration name. Every pick, the pitch notes, can be bought “today, in any regular brokerage account, with no options approval, no accredited-investor paperwork,” which is factually true for these names: they all trade over the counter in the United States.

The promotion follows the house pattern: the specific bonus report titles and any add-on upsells sit behind the order page, so it is worth reading the checkout flow before committing. The 30-day refund is the standard safety valve, and it matters here more than usual because two of the four names are sub-dollar explorers whose outcomes will take years to resolve, not months.

Our Take

The nuclear-power-for-AI thesis is real, and Del Real is a knowledgeable guide to it. His credentials are genuine, the supply tightness is real, the Big Tech demand is observable, and the contrarian timing, pitching uranium now after sentiment cooled from the AI-nuclear peak, is more intellectually honest than pitching it at the top. He is also right that the accessibility framing is accurate: these are names anyone can buy in a normal brokerage account.

The pitch is thinner where it matters most. The “tens of thousands of percent” history cherry-picks two non-repeatable dislocations and presents them as the expected outcome. The “in-ground resource value” math inflates the apparent bargain in both juniors by counting historical and inferred resources as if they were reserves. And the whole package is largely a re-air of the uranium promos Del Real has run since 2023, with a new label on it. The “supply shock hitting just days ago” is vague and unverifiable, and it papers over the fact that uranium prices have been drifting lower recently.

If you believe the uranium supply squeeze is intact and want exposure to it, ATHA’s seven-million-acre land position is a defensible, if slow, way to express that, and Sprott Physical Uranium is the lower-risk vehicle for owning the fuel itself. Skyharbour is a pure drill-bit speculation with a decade of sideways history behind it. Treat this as an educational read on the uranium setup, not as a green light to chase “tens of thousands of percent” into two sub-dollar juniors. This letter is a reasonable fit for investors who already understand that junior mining is a portfolio-of-lottery-tickets game and size their positions accordingly; it is a poor fit for anyone who reads “tens of thousands of percent” and expects those numbers on a two-year horizon. The nuclear power story we see in pitches like the Monument Traders Alliance “Energy Cube” teardown runs on the same supply squeeze, and the honest version of that story is a long, lumpy buildout, not an overnight windfall.

Where to Learn More

NewsletterVetter is an independent publication. We receive compensation from some of the services we review through affiliate links. Nothing on this site is investment advice. Always do your own research.