The Largest of the Big Three
When Rob Spivey’s “The #1 Oil Income Play of 2026” names Baker Hughes as its pick, the natural comparison set is the rest of the Big Three, and the biggest of them is Schlumberger (SLB), the global heavyweight of oilfield services. Understanding Schlumberger is the fastest way to understand what the promo’s pick is and is not.
Schlumberger has spent decades as the largest, most internationally diversified oilfield services company in the world. It operates in more countries than its peers, serves both onshore and offshore markets, and has built out a digital and reservoir-technology business that gives it a layer its competitors have not fully matched.
The 2022 Rebrand
One of the more visible changes in the sector happened in 2022, when Schlumberger rebranded to SLB, a move the company framed as a step beyond its oilfield-services roots toward a broader energy-technology identity. The ticker changed along with the name, and the market now knows the company by those three letters.
The rebrand signaled real intent. SLB has pushed further into low-carbon and digital energy technologies while keeping its core services franchise, a balancing act that separates it from the more traditional, drilling-focused profile of Halliburton.
How It Stacks Up to the Pick
On valuation, Schlumberger sits between its two rivals. It trades around 18 times forward earnings, versus roughly 22 times for Baker Hughes and 13 times for Halliburton, even though all three carry similar analyst growth forecasts. Schlumberger does not get the full AI-power premium that Baker Hughes commands for its turbine franchise, but it trades above Halliburton thanks to its scale and digital business.
The income picture is also a useful contrast. Baker Hughes distributed about $910 million in 2025, roughly 1.5 percent on a nearly $59 billion market cap, and Schlumberger’s yield is in a similar, modest range. Neither is a high-yield income investment, which is a point worth holding against the promo’s “oil income play” label.
What Moves Schlumberger
Schlumberger’s earnings follow the same commodity cycle as the rest of the group, with one twist: its international and offshore exposure means it tends to benefit most when operators spend on large, long-cycle projects outside North America. That makes it a different instrument than Halliburton, which is tied more tightly to North American shale, and than Baker Hughes, whose turbine orders add an electricity-demand driver the others lack.
The sector-wide recovery is showing up across the board. Baker Hughes reported a 29 percent jump in orders in the second quarter of 2026, and the same spending tide lifts Schlumberger’s international book. Our oilfield services companies article compares the three profiles in more detail.
The Digital Layer
Schlumberger has spent years building out a digital and software business on top of its hardware services, selling subsurface data, modeling, and automation tools to operators who want to drill and produce more efficiently. That digital layer is one of the clearest differences between Schlumberger and its peers, and it is a big part of why the 2022 rebrand to SLB made sense.
The appeal of the digital business is that it behaves differently from the hardware cycle. Software and data contracts are recurring and higher-margin, and they smooth the swings that come from the drilling cycle. Baker Hughes and Halliburton have digital offerings too, but Schlumberger has pushed the furthest, and investors treat that as a reason to pay more than the pure services multiple.
Where the Rebrand Leaves It
The rebrand also set expectations. Calling the company SLB and describing it as an energy-technology business invites investors to compare it with the faster-growing names in the energy transition, even though the core revenue is still oilfield services. That tension shows up in the multiple, around 18 times forward earnings, which is above Halliburton but below Baker Hughes. We break down the ticker itself in our SLB stock explainer.
For someone weighing the promo’s pick, Schlumberger is the reference point for what the largest, most diversified name in the sector actually trades at. It is bigger than Baker Hughes, cheaper on the multiple, and carries a similar modest yield. That combination is a useful check on the idea that the promo’s pick is somehow the standout opportunity in the group.
The Bottom Line
Schlumberger is the scale leader, the most global, and now the most broadly rebranded of the Big Three, trading at a middle multiple that reflects a business between the pure services cycle and the technology future. For investors weighing the promo’s pick, Schlumberger is the reminder that Baker Hughes is not the only game in the sector, and not even the biggest one.
Ready to see the research? Click here to access Rob Spivey’s report.
NewsletterVetter is an independent publication. We receive compensation from some of the services we review through affiliate links. Nothing on this site is investment advice. Always do your own research.