The Tax Term Is Not the Marketing Term
“Passive income” is a marketing phrase. “Passive activity” is a tax classification, and the two do not mean the same thing. Understanding the difference is useful when a newsletter promotion sells you an “account” that produces “passive income,” as the “29% Account” pitch does.
In tax terms, a passive activity is a trade or business in which you do not materially participate. The passive activity rules exist to stop investors from using losses from businesses they do not actually run to offset their ordinary income from wages or investments. The rules limit how passive losses can be deducted, generally allowing them only against passive income, with unused losses carried forward.
Where Royalties Fit
Here is the wrinkle that surprises people: most royalty income is not treated as passive activity income. Royalties from oil and gas interests, and from intellectual property you did not help create, are generally classified as portfolio income, the same bucket as dividends and interest. That means the passive activity loss rules do not apply the way they would to a rental property or a side business.
In other words, a royalty stream can feel “passive” in the everyday sense while being “portfolio income” in the tax sense. The distinction matters if you are planning around losses, because portfolio income cannot be sheltered by passive losses the way passive income can.
What It Means for the Pitch
The “29% Account” is sold as an effortless, passive way to earn. The tax reality is that its income, when there is income, is mostly ordinary income and capital gains on a stock, not a special “passive” category with tax advantages attached. The 29 percent figure is a capital-appreciation average, not a passive yield. We break that down in our Texas Pacific Land breakdown and the tax treatment in our royalty income tax treatment explainer.
As always with tax questions, the specifics depend on your situation, so treat this as background and consult a professional before acting.
NewsletterVetter is an independent publication. We receive compensation from some of the services we review through affiliate links. Nothing on this site is investment advice. Always do your own research.