A seismic survey is the first serious money an exploration project spends, and it is spent long before any drilling begins. It is a systematic scan of the subsurface that tells geologists where the promising rock formations are, and it is the thread that ties together Jim Rickards’s “$150 Trillion Birthright” presentation, also called American Birthright Phase II.
Rickards, a former general counsel at Long-Term Capital Management, best-selling author on currency and geopolitics, and editor of model Press’s Strategic Intelligence letter, builds his pitch on the idea that discovery technology comes before digging. He argues that President Trump “opened 650 million acres of federal land containing an estimated $150 trillion in buried minerals” and that mining companies will be “legally required to find the exact location of these mineral deposits BEFORE they can dig a single hole.” From there he names three “MDP” companies, mineral-discovery-technology plays, that he says could dominate the survey work. Understanding what a seismic survey actually finds is the key to sizing up that claim.
What a Survey Actually Reveals
A seismic survey finds structure. It maps where rock layers sit, how they bend and fold, and where traps might form. For oil and gas, that is often enough to prioritize drilling targets, because the goal is usually a porous reservoir capped by an impermeable seal. The survey shows you the geometry of that arrangement.
For minerals, the picture is murkier. Mineral deposits do not always announce themselves with the clean structural signature that oil traps do. Finding a hard-rock mineral deposit typically requires additional work, including magnetic, electromagnetic, and geochemical surveys, on top of any seismic data. Seismic is one tool in a larger kit, not the whole kit, and the Birthright pitch tends to treat it as the whole kit.
The Three Companies Behind the Pitch
“The Pioneer” is Geospace Technologies, a Houston-area maker of land and marine seismic equipment with about $116 million in trailing revenue. “The Wildcat” is TGS ASA, the Norwegian energy-data firm formed from the 2023 merger of TGS and PGS, which licenses offshore seismic data. “The Innovator” is MIND Technology, which builds offshore seismic hardware under the Seamap brand, including the SeaLink streamer and the Sea Serpent passive arrays.
All three are real, established survey businesses. All three also earn most of their revenue from oil and gas customers. Our teardown of the presentation found that the mineral-discovery framing overstates how much of their business is actually tied to mining.
The Claims Versus the Numbers
The presentation assigns big targets: “4,800% gain potential” for Geospace Technologies, “1,520% gain potential” for TGS ASA, and “4,340% gain potential” for MIND Technology. It also suggests Geospace Technologies could reach $1.8 billion in revenue “as soon as next year,” a roughly 15-fold jump from $116 million with no disclosed driver.
The scoreboard since the tease is the clearest answer. The June 24, 2025 catalyst tied to unlocking Phase II came and went with no surge. Since then, Geospace Technologies is down 73.8% and MIND Technology down 56.8%, while TGS ASA is up 8.9%. One single-digit gain and two large losses against four-digit promises.
What the Honest Read Looks Like
Seismic surveys are a genuine and durable business, and the pick-and-shovel logic is sound: surveyors get paid for activity, not for discovery. What the presentation gets looser is the timing and the category. These are energy-services companies first, and their fortunes follow exploration budgets, not a mineral mandate. Our critical minerals strategy explainer separates the real policy push from the marketing, and our deep-sea mining explainer covers the offshore side of the same story.
The offer behind the pitch is the Situation Report at $1,995 per year with no refunds. The survey business is real, the mechanism is sound, and the specific stocks still need evidence of rising exploration spending before any of the promised gains make sense.
A single survey is also a multi-step project. A crew plans the grid, positions the source and receivers, shoots the lines, records the returns, and then spends weeks or months processing the data into an image a geologist can read. Each step is a separate cost and a separate revenue line for the companies involved. That structure is why the survey business is called picks and shovels: every one of those steps gets paid regardless of what the final image shows. It also explains why the surveyors rise and fall with the number of active projects, which in turn follows the energy companies’ capital budgets.
The survey cycle also has a lead-lag rhythm worth understanding. Operators approve budgets first, surveyors book work next, and the drillers follow after. That means survey revenue can pick up before drilling activity does, which is why survey stocks sometimes move early in an upcycle. It also means they can fall first when budgets get cut, since surveys are often the easiest spending to defer.
Ready to see the research? Click here to view the American Birthright presentation.
NewsletterVetter is an independent publication. We receive compensation from some of the services we review through affiliate links. Nothing on this site is investment advice. Always do your own research.