“Gold stocks” is a broad label that covers everything from the largest global producers to tiny explorers with a drill program and a dream. The risk and reward at each end of that spectrum are wildly different, and understanding where a company sits is the first job of any investor in the sector. Jim Rickards’ “Trump’s Secret $2 Gold Mine” pitch lands at the far speculative end of that spectrum, with Northern Dynasty Minerals, the owner of the Pebble Project in Alaska.
The Spectrum
At the top sit the majors, companies like Newmont and Barrick that produce millions of ounces a year, generate steady cash flow, and often pay dividends. Their shares move with the gold price, but their earnings cushion the volatility, because they are already mining and selling metal today.
In the middle sit the mid-tier and emerging producers, companies that are either ramping up mines or operate a handful of assets. They carry more risk than the majors but still have real production to anchor their value.
At the bottom sit the juniors and the developers, companies that own a deposit but have not yet built a mine. Northern Dynasty Minerals, trading as NAK on the NYSE American and NDM.TO on the Toronto exchange, sits here. It owns one of the largest undeveloped gold and copper deposits on earth, but it produces nothing, earns nothing from mining, and trades at a market capitalization near $900 million with the shares around $1.61. For more on the mechanics of how these companies move, see our explainer on gold mining stocks.
Why the Spread Matters
The reason the spectrum matters is that a gold rally does not distribute its gains evenly. When the metal rises, the majors reprice their existing production, but the juniors reprice an entire reserve base that may be worth many times their market value. That is why a junior can rise many times faster than the metal, and also why it can collapse just as quickly when the metal stalls or a permit is denied.
Northern Dynasty illustrates both sides. The pitch values the Pebble deposit at “up to $2.7 trillion,” with “161+ million ounces of gold,” a figure that is technically the in-situ value of the metal in the ground, before the cost of building, operating, and permitting the mine. The company has been trying to permit Pebble for more than twenty years, and the project sits near Bristol Bay, one of the most productive wild salmon fisheries on earth. The EPA issued a Clean Water Act veto in 2023, and the Army Corps rejected a permit in 2024.
Reading the Risk
For a diversified investor, the practical takeaway is that “gold stocks” is not one decision but several. A major is a relatively conservative way to own the gold price. A junior like NAK is a binary bet on a legal ruling, specifically the summary-judgment decision in the lawsuit over the EPA veto that Rickards’ November 3 countdown points to. The two should never be sized the same way.
For a wider look at the sector and how different names stack up, see our guide to the gold stock universe and our roundup of specific gold stock picks.
Knowing where a gold stock sits on the spectrum, producer versus explorer, permitted versus vetoed, is worth more than any headline return number. It tells you what you are actually betting on.
The Gold Tailwind and Why It Matters
The reason the whole gold stock conversation is happening now is that the metal itself has been in a strong run, driven by forces that have nothing to do with any single company. Central banks have been buying gold at the heaviest pace since 1950, which puts a structural bid under the market. Falling real interest rates remove the opportunity cost of holding gold, and a softening dollar makes the metal cheaper in other currencies. These are the durable drivers, and they are why even the conservative end of the sector has been performing.
That tailwind is real, and it is the honest foundation of any gold stock pitch, Rickards’ included. Rickards is a credible voice on the macro side: he was the general counsel at Long-Term Capital Management and helped negotiate its 1998 rescue, and he has written a shelf of bestselling books on currency and monetary policy. His case for gold is a macro case, and it holds up on its own terms.
The caution is that a rising tide does not lift every boat equally. The majors and the funds ride the gold price directly. A junior like NAK is riding a legal ruling, and gold could keep climbing for a year while the Pebble permit fight stays exactly where it is. Recognizing which part of the pitch is about gold and which part is about a court case is the whole game.
NewsletterVetter is an independent publication. We receive compensation from some of the services we review through affiliate links. Nothing on this site is investment advice. Always do your own research.