Hedera transactions are the measurable heart of the technical case in Eric Wade’s “No. 1 Crypto Play for 2025” pitch, and the numbers are genuinely impressive on paper. Hedera claims high throughput, near-instant finality, and a per-transaction energy cost that is a rounding error next to Bitcoin’s. Here is what those figures actually mean, how they compare, and what they do and do not prove.

The Speed Numbers

Hedera’s headline claim is throughput of around 10,000 transactions per second. That is orders of magnitude faster than Bitcoin, which processes a handful of transactions per second, and faster than Ethereum’s base layer as well. For comparison, major payment networks run in the tens of thousands of transactions per second, so Hedera’s figure puts it in the same conversational range as traditional finance rather than the slow lane of early crypto.

Speed matters for real applications. A ledger that settles in seconds can handle payments, token transfers, and enterprise workflows that a slower chain cannot. That is the practical argument behind the pitch: a fast, cheap network is the kind that businesses might actually use, and actual use is what would drive demand for the HBAR token.

The Energy Comparison

The energy figure is the one that travels furthest in marketing. Hedera has cited per-transaction energy use of roughly 0.000003 kilowatt-hours, versus roughly 848 kilowatt-hours for a Bitcoin transaction. That is not a small gap; it is a difference of many orders of magnitude, driven by the fact that Hedera does not use proof-of-work mining.

That efficiency is a genuine and defensible advantage, especially as energy use has become a political and environmental criticism of Bitcoin. It is also a reminder that not all cryptocurrencies are alike: the energy problem that applies to proof-of-work chains does not apply to a hashgraph network. Our hashgraph technology article explains the mechanism behind the efficiency.

Fees and Finality

Alongside speed and energy, Hedera transactions are notable for two other properties: low, predictable fees and fast finality. Fees are paid in the HBAR token and are small enough that micropayments become practical. Finality means that once a transaction is confirmed, it is considered permanent, with no risk of a chain reorganization reversing it. Both properties appeal to enterprises that want certainty and cost control.

That combination, speed, cheap fees, energy efficiency, and finality, is a coherent technical story. It is the strongest part of the pitch and the part that is easiest to verify against the network’s own documentation rather than marketing copy.

What the Numbers Do Not Prove

The limit of the transaction argument is that technical capacity is not the same as adoption. A network capable of 10,000 transactions per second is only valuable if applications actually send those transactions. Hedera’s real-world volume is a small fraction of its theoretical capacity, which is normal for a young network but is the key gap between the technology story and the token price.

That gap is visible in the token’s price itself. The pitch teased HBAR around $0.29 in early 2025, and it trades near $0.08 now. The technology did not get slower; the market simply has not yet priced the adoption the pitch assumed. See our Hedera HBAR article for the token’s current state, and our No. 1 crypto play teardown for the promo’s timing.

Comparing to Payment Networks

The most useful benchmark for Hedera’s transaction figures is not Bitcoin but traditional payment networks. Visa and similar systems process thousands of transactions per second at sub-cent costs, and they do so with the trust of a central operator. Hedera’s 10,000 transactions per second claim puts it in a range where it could theoretically serve real payment volume, which is genuinely notable for a decentralized network.

But the comparison also exposes the gap. A payment network’s throughput is proven by billions of daily transactions and decades of uptime. Hedera’s figure is a capability statement, demonstrated in tests more than in sustained real-world load. The distance between “capable of 10,000 transactions per second” and “processing 10,000 transactions per second of real payments” is where the adoption question lives, and it is the same question that separates the technology story from the token price.

The Bottom Line

Hedera’s transaction metrics are real and favorable: high throughput, tiny energy use, low fees, and fast finality that put it far ahead of Bitcoin on every technical measure. Those numbers make a legitimate case that the network is usable at scale. What they do not prove is that scale will arrive, and until usage catches up to capacity, the token’s price will keep depending on a bet about the future rather than a fact about the present.

Ready to see the research? Click here to access Eric Wade’s report.

NewsletterVetter is an independent publication. We receive compensation from some of the services we review through affiliate links. Nothing on this site is investment advice. Always do your own research.