The satellite stock spectrum

Satellite stocks break into a few distinct groups. There are the operators that run constellations for communications, imagery, and earth observation, the manufacturers that build the spacecraft, and the ground-systems companies that control the satellites and move their data. Most retail attention goes to the operators because their names are familiar, but the ground-systems layer is where a growing share of the durable revenue sits.

In Jason Simpkins’s “Galactic Supply Chain” presentation, the satellite angle is carried by Kratos Defense and Security Solutions (KTOS), which trades around $47.78 and holds a market capitalization near $9.3 billion. Kratos is not a satellite operator; it is the company building the software-defined ground infrastructure that operators and the military rely on, which is a different and arguably stickier position in the value chain.

What Kratos actually does in space

Kratos’s space story centers on a platform called OpenSpace, which the pitch describes as “software-defined ground systems,” and which has been compared to the “AWS of satellite ground systems.” The idea is that instead of building bespoke ground hardware for every mission, customers subscribe to a software layer that can track, task, and communicate with satellites using shared infrastructure. That subscription model carries software-like margins and recurring revenue, which is why it attracts attention.

The company backs that up with hard contract wins. Its space and satellite division posted a three-to-one book-to-bill ratio in the first quarter, meaning it booked three dollars of new orders for every dollar of revenue, and company-wide the figure was around one and a half to one. Kratos also won a $446.8 million Space Force award for a missile-warning ground network, which ties the satellite business directly to national security spending. On top of that, it holds a $1.45 billion hypersonic test-bed contract called MACH-TB, awarded in January 2025, that stretches the company beyond satellites and into the wider defense mission.

The defense angle

The reason a defense specialist flags a satellite-ground-systems company is straightforward: the U.S. military’s dependence on space has grown faster than its ground infrastructure. Tracking missile launches, communicating across theaters, and tasking reconnaissance satellites all run through ground systems, and the Space Force has been spending to modernize them. Kratos sits at the center of that modernization, which is why its book-to-bill and backlog are the numbers that matter most.

That same theme runs through the broader defense-electronics names that get grouped into space promos. We covered how a company like L3Harris Technologies, the defense contractor often meant by “Harris Technologies” in search queries, fits the picture in our Harris Technologies explainer. The logic is similar across the sector: the picks are the infrastructure and systems companies, not the consumer-facing end products.

The valuation catch

The honest tension in Kratos is valuation. Analysts project around $1.12 per share in earnings next year, which puts the stock at more than 40 times forward earnings. That is a high multiple for a defense contractor, and it is especially notable because the stock was bid to roughly 400 times earnings last December before pulling back. Revenue growth of 20% or more is expected for 2027 and 2028, but the current price already reflects a lot of that optimism.

None of this makes Kratos a bad business. OpenSpace is a genuinely differentiated product, the book-to-bill is strong, and the defense backlog is real. The caution is about entry price: chasing the promo’s “2-10 times” framing at current levels means paying a premium for contracts that are still converting into revenue. For a broader look at how satellite and space names are grouped by investors, our space ETF piece explains the composition of the sector.

Why ground systems are the sticky layer

The reason software-defined ground systems matter is that satellites are only as useful as the infrastructure that talks to them. Every satellite in orbit has to be tracked, tasked, and downlinked, and as constellations grow into the thousands, that becomes a software and networking problem rather than a hardware one. A platform that lets multiple customers share that infrastructure, the way cloud computing shares data-center capacity, is the natural answer.

Kratos’s OpenSpace sits in that position. The pitch’s “AWS of satellite ground systems” comparison is apt because the business model is similar: shared infrastructure, subscription pricing, and software margins instead of one-off hardware sales. That is why the space division’s three-to-one book-to-bill ratio is the number to focus on, because it shows the subscription model actually winning contracts rather than just being described in a slide deck.

The missile-warning award adds another layer. Ground systems are not just a commercial story; they are a national-security one, because missile warning, space surveillance, and satellite command all run through the same software layer. That dual demand, commercial and defense, is what makes the ground-systems segment stickier than the satellite hardware it supports.

NewsletterVetter is an independent publication. We receive compensation from some of the services we review through affiliate links. Nothing on this site is investment advice. Always do your own research.