In a gold rush, the reliable money often goes to the people selling picks and shovels, not the people panning for gold. Seismic surveying is the modern version of that idea for the resource sector. The surveyors get paid to map what lies underground, and they collect their fee whether or not anyone finds anything. That simple mechanic is the backbone of Jim Rickards’s “$150 Trillion Birthright” presentation.

Rickards, a former general counsel at Long-Term Capital Management, best-selling author on currency and geopolitics, and editor of model Press’s Strategic Intelligence letter, argues that President Trump “opened 650 million acres of federal land containing an estimated $150 trillion in buried minerals” and that mining companies will be “legally required to find the exact location of these mineral deposits BEFORE they can dig a single hole.” His pitch says three small companies could dominate the surveying technology. The picks-and-shovels logic is worth taking seriously, even if the specific numbers need a closer look.

Why Surveyors Get Paid Either Way

A seismic surveying company sells work, not outcomes. It shoots a survey, processes the data, and hands over a map of the subsurface. The client pays for that map regardless of what the map shows. If the client drills and strikes oil, the surveyor does not share the upside. If the client drills a dry hole, the surveyor has already been paid.

That changes the risk profile completely. A driller can lose everything on a single bad well. A surveyor’s downside is a slow order book during a downturn, not a write-off on a failed project. This is why surveying is often described as a lower-risk way to gain exposure to an exploration cycle, and it is the strongest, most honest part of the Birthright thesis.

The Equipment and Data Sides

The surveying business has two halves. One sells the hardware that records sound, the sensors, streamers, and arrays. The other sells the data and the processing that turn those recordings into usable images. The Birthright picks span both.

“The Pioneer” is Geospace Technologies, a Houston-area maker of land and marine seismic equipment with about $116 million in trailing revenue. “The Innovator” is MIND Technology, which builds offshore seismic hardware under the Seamap brand, including the SeaLink streamer. “The Wildcat” is TGS ASA, the Norwegian energy-data firm formed from the 2023 merger of TGS and PGS, which leans toward the data licensing side.

What the Pitch Overstates

The presentation claims “the market for their services could explode from $2 billion to $100 billion over the next 12 months” and attaches big targets: “4,800% gain potential” for Geospace Technologies, “1,520% gain potential” for TGS ASA, and “4,340% gain potential” for MIND Technology.

Our teardown of the presentation found the mining framing is thin. These are oil and gas seismic companies, and their revenue has tracked energy exploration budgets and the oil price for decades. Mineral discovery is a small part of what they do. Federal leasing also grows gradually, on the order of one percent a year, so the sudden explosion the ad describes does not match how the acreage actually gets released.

The Scoreboard Since the Tease

The June 24, 2025 catalyst tied to unlocking Phase II came and went with no surge. Since the tease, Geospace Technologies is down 73.8% and MIND Technology down 56.8%, while TGS ASA is up 8.9%. Against four-digit promises, that is one single-digit gain and two large losses.

None of this means the picks-and-shovels idea is wrong. It means the timing and the specific stocks deserve caution. For the adjacent themes, our critical minerals strategy explainer and our AI mineral exploration coverage separate the real policy push from the promotional framing.

The offer behind the pitch is the Situation Report at $1,995 per year with no refunds. The surveying mechanic is real, the companies are legitimate, and the case for them should rest on evidence of rising exploration spending rather than a promotional deadline.

The picks-and-shovels analogy is older than the oil business. The merchants who sold tools to the forty-niners mostly did better than the miners who dug for gold, and the lesson carried into the oil patch, where the equipment and service firms have often been the steadier way to play a boom. The same logic is what makes surveying an attractive framing for a resource rush. The caveat is that the analogy works in both directions: when the rush ends, the tool sellers lose customers just as fast. A surveyor with no active projects has fixed costs and nothing to sell. That is why the current state of exploration budgets matters more than any single land announcement.

The history of the survey business also carries a warning. After the 2010 to 2012 boom, the offshore seismic industry went through a brutal multi-year downturn as oversupply and falling oil prices crushed demand. Several firms restructured or merged, and the survivors only stabilized by consolidating. That backdrop is what any survey investment should be measured against, and it is why the cyclical risk here is real, not theoretical.

Ready to see the research? Click here to view the American Birthright presentation.

NewsletterVetter is an independent publication. We receive compensation from some of the services we review through affiliate links. Nothing on this site is investment advice. Always do your own research.